Dear Diary - a rolling 4 months of comment
Black Friday treat.
These arrived today from Anschluss Wargames. They are resin (3D print I think) 1/144 (12mm) WWII models. I occassionally order just a few at a time to fill out various gaps in my collection, hence the eclectic mix here.
You are looking at a platoon of 5 x T34/76 early, 1 x Panther G, 1 x StuG III, 1 x JSII and 2 x Universal Carriers.
Anschluss are doing a 15% Black Friday discount at the moment, which on a small order of this size, basically covers the postage charge (internally within the UK).
The detail on the models is nicely done and those with a turret come in two parts, the body and turret. The Stug and Bren carriers are single prints.
I never know whether this kind of material needs priming, but I do it anyway with vallejo poly primer, brushed on.
Just something else to add to the painting queue :-)
In the background the Gettysburg 'Day One' battle rumbles on, with some nice moments making for compelling play.
First morning of Gettysburg
Gettysburg game from Worthing Publishing sits on my table.
I am going for the three day battle and yesterday I managed to play the morning of the first day, which is 6 one hourly turns.
It has opened in much the same way that Gettysburg games generally do. Heth has been pressing in what becomes the centre, but a whole series of really low die rolls (equals poor firepower) by both sides has allowed the Union cavalry to avoid being crushed by the advancing Confederates by repeatingly withdrawing.
The photo on the left shows first contact with the Confederates defending Herr Ridge. Archer (green square means below average morale) will be sent reeling back after facing canister fire from Tidball's guns. However, Davis does put Gambles cavalry to flight and he gets a foothold on the ridge. This unhinging of the Union defence will see Bufords cavalry and guns voluntarily fall back towards Willoughby Run.
By noon, the result of the cavalry repeatedly falling back is that the cavalry are now pretty much intact, apart from Tidball's artillery, which has not fared well in the repeat withdrawals. In my last game, the Cavalry had fought a harder battle and were largely exhausted by this point. It is also true that Heth's brigades remain relatively fresh!
Now, Rhodes is arriving to reinforce the Confederate left and of more urgent concern to the Union is the fact that Pender’s division (Confederate) is moving out to the right …. Stretching the Union defence along the flank position of Seminary Ridge.
It is turning into something of an ACW week as I ‘up’ the painting session to try and make my end of month goal for painting the Epic Confederate figures. I might just do it, but we are in the last three days of this shorter month …… serves me right for having the middle of the month off :-)
Epic Hannibal
Whilst my own Epic Hannibal box is in a long painting queue, I enjoy the blogs / videos that other people are showing regarding their collections.
7th Son has just put up a YouTube video of an AAR from a scratch built scenario that has some interesting elements. I particularly like that the game only starts with two divisions (Hail Caesar) per side and that reinforcements then bring the game to standard army size.
The mix of force types between Roman and Carthaginian make for some dynamic games.
My own stuff has been temporarily based to accord with the style use by ‘Scotty’ in his series of Hannibal videos. This is a variation on the Warlord Games' system, so perhaps I should just get that to the table and start testing the basing style in play before I commit.
Her is a link to 7th Son video
Old School Tactical - ANZIO
I put Scenario 5 up on the table yesterday from the 5 scenario Anzio bonus booklet just released.
'Wet & Wild' covers an attack on American units hunkered in and around a church on 27th March 1944.
I know that I have read about this somewhere, but my Google Fu and checking my reference books have failed me so far!
This is essentially a German battalion level attack (3rd Panzer Grenadiers) across open farmland to prise the Americans out of some local buildings, one of which is a church, with a graveyard attached.
One of the notable aspects of the campaign was the dire weather and heavy rains which turned everything to mud. This has the effect of slowing the Germans down as they moved across farmland to engage. The essence of the scenario seems to be that the Americans must inflict as many casualties as they can on the slow moving German infantry before they become overwhelmed.
At first I thought the game was tough on the German player .... by game end, I changed that opinion to this being tough on the American side, though I think some of my initial placements did not help them.
Warriors of England
We played our second face-to-face game of Warriors of England (Published by Multi-Man publishing) and Mike's fourth face-to-face game last night.
The subject covers the late medieval Wars of the Roses. Each of the three previous playings have gone in different directions, but with the Lancastrians losing. Mike was keen to explore a Lancastrian victory and chose to attack strongly at the first opportunity.
This caused the Yorkists significant harm in terms of early loss of both territory and military strength, an important matter with the two fledgling forces. This then had a dominoe effect over the first four turns as the victory point gap widened with the Yorkists struggling to gain enough territory to keep the VP's in closer balance.
By the end of turn four (less than halfway through the game) the Lancastrians scored a Sudden Death victory based upon their victory point score.
This leads to the interesting speculation as to whether there is a way to crack the game, discovered by repeat play. The question will be whether a Lancastrian strategy of opening with an aggressive attack will always swing the game in an inevitable direction? Only further plays will see.
The opening attack is of course dice dependent, so a failed initial Lancastrian attack on poor dice rolls would negate such an opening advantage, but the opening attack has leader benefits that offer a +1 on attacks, so in terms of balance, the attacks will more often than not go the Lancastrian way.
In terms of how the board looked on Turn 4, I think the Yorkist player could have fought on with the possibility that by Turn 5 and the capture of Yorkshire, the Victory Point track might have dipped below the 'Sudden Death' point ...... but, that doesn't take into account the Lancastrians doing well in other parts of the board. Regardless, I doubt that over the course of the game, the Yorkists could have ever brought the VP marker back into Yorkist favour.
No doubt the 'Sudden Death' rule is there to reconise that a tipping point of no return has been reached.
A further interesting point is that on each turn, who goes first is subject to a pair of die rolls. If the Yorkists win this, then having regard for this particular Lancastrian strategy, what would be the best Yorkist move to counter that.
So there is still a bit to explore here. Overall I think the game and system is enjoyable, we just need to see whether 'a certain opening move' becomes too decisive.
Painting for the ACW Epic project
I have recently lost my paintig rythmn and discipline to do 40 - 60 minutes of painting every day to get the Epic ACW project moved forwards.
The idea was that the project would be fully painted for a game just before Christmas.
Anyway, its not too late, the paints came out today and a bit of catch up is needed to get two more units done before the months end, so I will need two or three sessions a day until 1st December.
That will leave me with just a couple of Confederate units to do in December, which should be do-able and still leave some time for a Christmas game.
I have a small number of Napoleonic French with a Commission painter to give me a leg up with a new project starting early next year, probably involving the Prussians.
I saw a really nice blog today with an interesting Napoleonic Epic game on a domestic sized table.
LINK
https://sparkerswargames.blogspot.com/2024/11/valour-fortitude-bergen-op-zoom-1814.html
Jena - the battle turns.
With the French breakthrough in the centre, the threat to the village of Kappellendorf, sitting astride the Coalition line of communication became immediately obvious, so it was with relief that Hohenlohe heard that Rüchel's wing had reached the battlefield and was advancing on Kappellendorf. They were moving up to cover the main lateral road on what was now becoming the Coalition's left.
It was becoming increasingly obvious that sending Soult out to the French right was a serious miscalculation. The battlefield had become split into two separate entities and Soult had become stuck in front of a narrow clearing between two large woods at Rödingen, effectively pinned by just a handful of Holtzedorf's brigades.
Despite their absence (together with The Guard) from Napoleon's main thrust, the French were making surprisingly good headway as Coalition losses started to mount and increasing numbers of units were caught up in a rout.
At around 1615, Lannes made another breakthrough, causing several Coalition units to rout and leaving Hohenlohe surrounded near Kotshau (see photo above), though he eventually managed to fight his way back to friendly lines. Rüchel's wing had arrived in the nick of time.
Regardless, the battle was now tipping with increasing certainty in favour of the French. Their entire front was collectively pushing and squeezing the Coalition back onto their lines of communication towards the Kappelldorf part of the battlefield and in the closing moments of the day's fighting, Murat's cavalry was close to isolating that town.
For the French, it was Lannes who had made all of this possible, hammering away at the Coalition defences for several hours. In the end it would be the overwhelming numbers of casualties suffered by the Coalition that gave the French their victory.
For the Coalition it would be fair to say that pretty much everyone had given 110%, but Holtzedorf pinning Soult and the timely arrival of Rüchel at Kappelldorf, were probably the formations that caused the French the most frustration in the game, together with the rendering of Ney being ineffective for so much of the game - in no small part due to the fact that the enemy cavalry kept his best troops in square for much of that time.
I now have a better understanding of what the scenario demands, so I imagine a second playing will give an even better game.
Although I played over three days, with the odd turn here and there. I think this battle would fit into a couple of evening sessions. If you stop at the half way, there is very much a game still there to be had, though I think the second half of the game might see (as mine did) a very obvious advantage going to one side and the other being left on the back foot. It depends upon your player character whether this sort of thing would suit you.
It is fine with me as I like to fully explore outcomes and seeing things played though to the reward of collapse or whatever, but more competitive players looking for a game rather than the pure history might lose some enthusiasm in the last couple of turns and want to call it on turn 6 (it is a 7 turn game).
From that perspective, I rather enjoyed my solo experience with the game and it does solo very well. Plus as a chit draw game for activation, you can walk away from this game after any activation and come back to it at any time as each chit draw is very much self contained, rather lime a mini turn.
Jena - Crisis in the centre
1100 hours - 1245 hours, while the French left was hanging on for dear life as Ney's position collapsed, in the centre, Lannes (French) had been pressing Tauentzien (Coalition) around Vierzehnheiligen (an important victory point location for the Coalition to retain).
Suddenly here, Coalition defences fell apart and Lannes' brigades (identified in the photo with a reddish / brown stripe on the top of their counters) moved out in multiple directions to fully rupture the Coalition line, creating a significant gap.
Neither side had immediate reserves on hand to either fill or exploit the gap and Lannes would need a couple of hours to reorganise his Corps and bring it back to functioning cohesively (required by the system's Command & Control rules to keep the corps together) - was this to be an opportunity lost?
Fortunately, within the hour, Murat (French) would arrive on the battlefield with his cavalry corps, advancing up through Jena and passing through Cospeda and Lannes' positions, to manoeuvre onto the top ground, around Klein-Romstedt, directly threatening to unhinge Hohenlohe's line and in particular Grawert's wing.
The Coalition line will now need to reorientate to protect their line of communication at Kappelledorf, just 4 Kilometres away, from Murat's threat.
The initiative seems to have passed back to the French, though the issue for them will be whether they can bring sufficient force to actually smash the coalition before it can respond - they will need to do this to carry the day.
More to follow!
Victrix 20% off sale
Victrix Miniatures are running their Black Friday sale with a 20% discount across the board.
The Jena game is ongoing, I am presently part way through turn 3 (0915 hours to 1100 hours) and there is plenty of nuance going on and a situation that I thought might be one sided is now putting the French to the test!.
I think as the French, I may have sent Soult in the wrong direction. I sent the Guard over to the right (more to keep them out of the way as the Coalition gain VP's if the Guard fight) and Soult followed in case of threat.
However the Coalition threat has actually emerged on the French left. Over there, Ney's Corps has taken position on the far left, but his infantry have just been caught by Coalition heavy cavalry.
They tried to form square, but failed their Cohesion Test, so instead have recoiled, disordered. The Cavalry have followed up and Ney is at great risk!
Jena 1806
Earlier this year, we got a new volume in the ongoing series ‘Jours de Gloire’ (Days of Glory), which covers Napoleonic battles.
Deux Années de Gloire (Two Years of Glory) gives us four classic battles, Jena, Auerstaedt, Eylau and Friedland from the 1806 / 07 period.
I have been away from the system for a while, so to ease myself back in, I thought that I would break into this set by playing Jena first.
While the game is quite detailed, the package oddly does not give a historical notes. For an account of the battle, I referenced the wonderfully illustrated book, ‘Jena, Auerstaedt - The Triumph of the Eagle’ published by Histoire & Collections. Though just giving a single chapter, it is rich in detail and it gave me a better idea of the direction that each army might be looking at.
This is a 7 turn game (there is also a 5 turn competition scenario) that starts while still dark and then plays through the 14th October until nightfall at 1800 hours.
If you click on the image you will get an enlarged view. I have drawn a line between the two armies because to my eyes, it is not that easy to tell the forces apart because the counter colours chosen are rather similar in this battle.
You can see the coalition forces are divided and those about to receive the French assault are too far away from the main body (2nd Group in the photo) to get early support.
The fragmented nature of the coalition is nicely replicated by the systems method of 'order' and 'activation'. It takes two to three turns for the commander chits of the coalition formation to be available to go into the draw bag, so in effect, these forces are present, but ineffective. Further the group about to be attacked by the French are too far away from the army commander, Hohenlohe, to be put into command, so they are on 'Limited Orders' making their responses, sluggish.
I was part way through the first turn and Lannes V Corps had done rather well with their attacks ..... then I remembered the special rule that due to the early hour combined with a heavy fog, turn 1 is treated as a night turn ... Doh! The French guns would not have able to attack at range.
So with only a few formations activated, I have been able to easily re-set the game and will start again tomorrow!
The bit that I played took a while because my head was in the rulebook, but everything is clicking in place now and I do like the detail and nuance that the system allows to fall from the game.
A pretty army gets an airing
Today, after some time sitting on the shelf, the Wars of the Roses collection hit the table, together with my new(ish) ridge feature fro S&A Scenics.
The ridge was actually bought for a planned Hastings game and it has a wider footprint and a flatter top to take the 28mm Anglo-Saxon army that was expected to fight on it. It is conveniently made in two parts, which match up perfectly, while giving easy storage.
The scene is essentially set for a session to become re-familiarised with the Hail Caesar rules from Warlord Games, the main elements of which quickly came back to memory.
I once again need to get the Piggy Longton campaign underway, we are at the start of 1472 with the year stretching before us, so perhaps, this should all happen in January, so that the years can be played out as an actual year.
Pendraken Book Sale
As a follow-up from yesterday's Khartoum post, I returned the game to the table and got a much more dynamic game. The Mahdist forces momentarily breached the Egyptian fortifications several times, but ultimately, Egyptian firepower was too powerful and they were ejected at every event.
To make matters worse, the British River Column arrived early in play (needs a ‘1’ to arrive mid game) and even when the Nile receded (event), the artillery armed steam boats helped ensure that every Mahdist attack along the Nile coastline failed! In the end, I gave up on turn 18!
On a brighter note, Pendraken miniatures have been having a sale on their books and prices have been rather good at around £4 - £5 each. These six titles slipped into my collection today;
Salerno 1943 by Angus Konstam, Published by Pen & Sword
Bull Run: its Strategy & Tactics by Robert Matterson Johnston, published by Kallmann
Napoleon against Russia by Digby Smith, published by Pen & Sword
Cromwell’s Masterstroke - Dunbar 1650, published by Pen & Sword
Naseby from the Battleground Series, published by Pen & Sword
Edgehill by Scott, Turton and Gruber von Arni, published by Pen & Sword
So, some rather nice titles. Three of them concern the English Civil War, something I hope to explore next year with some small (unpainted) Epic Pike & Shotte armies and Salerno is part of my drive this year to learn more of my ‘father’s war’.
1812 will be useful at a future point and Bull Run is something that I will be diving into next year, with some themed linked battles with what by then should be expanded Epic ACW armies.
Next up, I am really hoping that a boardgame covering Napoleon’s 1806 Jena will grace the table.
The counters are cut and the rules are out ready to be read, but first, I need to do another play test game of Stamford Bridge (1066).
Much to do and time does not spread far enough :-)
A Khartoum game - mixed views!
Siege of Khartoum is a boardgame designed by Stephen Kling and published by The Historical Game Company. The game covers the Mahdist revolt and the situation created when the Mahdist isolated the town of Khartoum.
General Gordon has been sent to organise an evacuation, but defies the Government and instead organises a defence, while waiting for a relief force. Can the Mahdist capture Khartoum before the relief column arrives?
This is a small format boardgame with hex and counters and a canvas map measuring 17” x 11”. It should play in a single session.
Of particular note, the rules are just 3 pages long, plus a page with the terrain chart. This is a series set of rules and there are now several titles in the series. I already have Poltava.
Each of the games, to fit with the common game engine, has an element of fortification on the map, though across the various games, these do not necessarily always translate as forts ‘proper’, but fit a variety of situations in which some have redoubts or perhaps a good defensive position such as the heights at Wagram or the heights at Saratoga.
The game engine relies on a ten card deck of cards per player. A card is drawn at the start of each player turn and it will state how many units you can move, how many you can fight with and also include a special rule, such as ‘Omdurman’s Rockets - Any Egyptian unit in Fort Omdurman may attack twice during Combat at a range of 4 hexes this turn’ and it is here that the flavour and history of the action is introduced. With 24 turns, the card stack will be cycled through two and a half times.
We played the game face-to-face tonight, but called the game part way through as it seemed impossible for the Mahdist player to make any headway to get into the fortified areas. My oponent, playing the Mahdist side described the situation as dispiriting.
However, for a first playing, I sense that there is a learning curve as to how to get the best use out of the armies and so I am going to play it again solo, now that I some experience with the demands of the scenario and thought about it a little, for my next game, I will use and deploy the Mahdist differently as follows;
1. Understand that this is a 24 turn game, so it probably needs that full playing time for the situation to 'develop' as it should.
2. On set-up, keep the 1-5-3 units out of the battle, they will be needed later once the fort is breached ..... they don't have much value in the elim pile!
3. Initially use the artillery to attack the units on the fortified walls, while concentrating all efforts on taking Fort Omdurman (on the other side of the Nile) and perhaps knocking the artillery armed steamer out.
4. Wait for the special event when the River Nile narrows (recedes), the additional expanse of dry land created will allow Mahdist forces along the Nile to move through that and circumvent the fort walls. The defence will be stretched. This is the point that all of those 1-5-3 troops can be unleashed.
note - this event will be played during the second round of card draw, so will occur on one ofthe turns between 11 and 20, one has to hope it is sooner!
5. There is errata that states the Mahdist Felucca (ships) with troops on can convert to infantry immediately if they land and still have 1 Movement point left (Without MP's left they wait until the next turn to unload).
I think the narrow focus of the Madhist plan will make the initial turns fly by.
Anyway, for good or for bad, that will be the plan - we shall see.
I didn’t really know too much about the campaign before getting the game, but my exposure to the game has left me wanting to take a deeper dive into the history, so it must be doing something right. There is a bibliography at the end of the rule book, which is helpful.
I bought my copy from Second Chance Games (UK) who seem to have a goodly range of all the games in the series - there will be something for everyone in that list. More on this in the coming days!
An e-Bay purchase and some learning!
I saw this painted unit of 5 Epic bases on e-bay and thought the painting quality was worth the punt. They have just arrived and I am delighted, but have a few observations that interest me enough to mull over.
These were sold as 5 bases, no doubt because that would be a 'standard' unit in Epic ACW Black Powder. However, I have dropped to units of 2 bases for a standard unit, so I can divide this collection into a 2 base unit and then a second 2 base unit ... or a 3 base unit if wanting to show a 'large' unit. So this takes my current Union collection from 7 units to 9, a nice boost indeed.
I like looking at figures painted by others as it gives away painting technique. On the web, these looked very nice and detailed. Set up in front of me they also look very nice and detailed, but on close examination I was surprised to note that crossbelts, hair and belt furniture had not been painted.
This is a bit of an eye opener to me, as I spend a couple of extra painting sessions with my figures doing those very thing, plus items such as facial hair, water canteens and bayonet sheaths and yet on the table, that doesn't seem to matter.
So the question for me is whether or not I am doing too much detail for the effect that these will give on the table - am I still in 28mm mode? If this does cause me a change in painting direction to a more short hand version of what I do now, then considering how much Epic stuff lays before me, then this e-bay purchase my be the best money I have spent on the hobby!
It looks like the painter has used traditional acrylic rather than the popular contrast paints and I feel that it is this, with its rich depth of colour density that helps carry the figure
The other thing is, they are based on MDF to 60mm and I use 55mm. I am in 2 minds about changing that. My hesitation is not for any sense of laziness, but rather, I do not want to damage the figures.
It is interesting to see that the painter has chosen to present the unit resting in an MDF (from Warbases) movement tray. Handy for the initial moves in column, but obviously not working once the unit falls out into line.
Anyway, it shows that it is worth keeping an eye on e-bay, as the odd gems do pop up (I searched under Painted ACW Epic). These cost me £57.50 with post included. Because I do paint practically all of my own stuff, these purchases won't happen too often, but as a 'leg-up' they are certainly a great help.